Welcome to this UK AstraZeneca produced and funded website

This website is intended for UK Healthcare Professionals only.

 

The website contains both promotional and non-promotional content.

 

If you are a patient or a carer of a patient prescribed an AstraZeneca product, please visit myazmed.co.uk

 

For any other UK residents please visit astrazeneca.co.uk

I am not a Healthcare Professional
Prescribing Information Tezspire®▼(tezepelumab)
Adverse Event Reporting
Safety Information

This website is intended for UK Healthcare professionals only. Other UK residents please visit astrazeneca.co.uk

AstraZeneca-logo
  • Our Medicines
    • Cardiovascular, Renal & Metabolism
      • ATTR Amyloidosis
        • WAINZUA®▼(eplontersen)
      • Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
        • FORXIGA® (dapagliflozin)
      • Heart Failure
        • FORXIGA® (dapagliflozin)
      • Hyperkalaemia
        • LOKELMA® (sodium zirconium cyclosilicate)
      • Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
        • FORXIGA® (dapagliflozin)
    • Oncology
      • Breast Cancer
        • LYNPARZA® (olaparib)
        • TRUQAP®▼(capivasertib)
      • Bladder Cancer
        • IMFINZI® (durvalumab)
      • Endometrial Cancer
        • IMFINZI® (durvalumab)
        • LYNPARZA® (olaparib)
      • Gastrointestinal Cancer
        • IMFINZI® (durvalumab)
        • IMJUDO®▼(tremelimumab)
      • Lung Cancer
        • IMFINZI® (durvalumab)
        • TAGRISSO® (osimertinib)
      • Ovarian Cancer
        • LYNPARZA® (olaparib)
      • Prostate Cancer
        • LYNPARZA® (olaparib)
        • ZOLADEX® (goserelin)
    • Respiratory
      • Asthma
        • TEZSPIRE®▼ (tezepelumab)
        • SYMBICORT® (budesonide/formoterol)
      • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD)
        • TRIXEO AEROSPHERE® (formoterol fumarate dihydrate/glycopyrronium/budesonide)
        • BEVESPI® (glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate)
    • Vaccines
      • Flu
        • FLUENZ® nasal spray suspension (influenza vaccine, live attenuated, nasal)
  • Therapy Areas
    • Cardiovascular, Renal & Metabolism
      • ATTR Amyloidosis
      • Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
      • Heart Failure
      • Hyperkalaemia
      • Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
    • Oncology
      • Breast Cancer
      • Bladder Cancer
      • Endometrial Cancer
      • Gastrointestinal Cancer
      • Lung Cancer
      • Ovarian Cancer
      • Prostate Cancer
    • Respiratory
      • Asthma
      • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD)
    • Vaccines
      • Flu
  • About us
    • AZ Commitment
  • Contact us
  • AstraZeneca UK
  • Tezspire
  • CRSwNP
  • Welcome to Tezspire
  • CRSwNP
  • How it works
  • Efficacy
    • Overview
    • Study Design
    • Exacerbation Data
    • Lung Function
    • Quality of Life
  • Patient Profiles
  • Safety
  • Dosing
  • Resources
    • Resources
    • Video Library
TEZSPIRE®
(tezepelumab) and
chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
hero_campaign_image.png

TEZSPIRE®
(tezepelumab) and
chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps  

  • Overview
  • WAYPOINT
  • Patient profile
  • Safety profile

CRSwNP: disease overview and role of TEZSPIRE
in the treatment landscape 

TEZSPIRE (tezepelumab) is indicated as an add-on therapy with intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adult patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) for whom therapy with systemic corticosteroids, and/or surgery do not provide adequate disease control.1

 

Tezspire is also indicated for the treatment of severe asthma and has been shown to significantly reduce asthma exacerbation rates.1-3

 

For severe asthma indication click here.

 

Find out more about the TEZSPIRE data in severe asthma here.

CRSwNP is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the upper airway that is characterised by chronic sinonasal inflammation and the formation of nasal polyps.4-6 Approximately 21% of patients with
moderate-to-severe asthma report a history of CRSwNP.7,8

 

CRSwNP has previously been managed with long-term intranasal corticosteroids, short courses of oral corticosteroids, endoscopic sinus surgery, and revision surgery.6,9,10 However, these approaches often fail to provide long-term disease control, resulting in disease and symptom recurrence.11

 

Severe asthma and severe CRSwNP have a substantial clinical and patient burden6,12-17

Many patients with severe asthma have comorbid nasal polyps.7

Patients with uncontrolled CRSwNP have a significant burden of symptoms such as:6

 

  • Nasal congestion
  • Rhinorrhoea/post-nasal drip
  • Facial pain/pressure
  • Impaired sense of smell
  • Sleep disturbance and/or fatigue  

 

Uncontrolled CRSwNP has a considerable impact on health-related quality of life and patients report that symptoms have a major impact on daily activities.12,13


Corticosteroid burden is high in patients with severe CRSwNP, particularly in patients with comorbid asthma, and even short courses of SCS have been found to increase the incidence of AEs.10

 

  • 53% of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma receive inhaled nasal corticosteroids14
  • 12% of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma receive oral corticosteroids14


Rates of steroid use are higher in patients who have undergone surgery for nasal polyps than the general population of patients with moderate-severe CRSwNP.14 Approximately half of patients with CRSwNP have undergone nasal surgery.15


Nasal polyp surgery is not always a long-term solution to CRSwNP. Over a 10-year period, a retrospective database analysis showed that more than 85% of patients with CRSwNP required revision surgery. In patients with comorbid asthma, the median time to revision surgery was 7 years compared with non-comorbid patients, in whom the median time was 9 years.16


CRSwNP has a substantial economic burden due to increased healthcare resource utilisation. Chronic rhinosinusitis is estimated to cost the UK healthcare system £16.8 billion per year, and on average, a patient with chronic rhinosinusitis misses 19 days of work per year.17

a.Data were retrospectively analysed using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database (25), for patients in England, aged 18 or over with a diagnosis of nasal polyposis and a relevant sinus surgery from April 2010-March 2020.

How TEZSPIRE works in CRSwNP 

TEZSPIRE is an anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody that binds to TSLP upon its release by epithelial cells in the upper and lower airways.1,18,19

 

TSLP is a key driver of inflammation in the upper and lower airways that is elevated in patients with severe asthma and severe CRSwNP.18,20,21 
Targeting TSLP at the top of the inflammatory cascade inhibits the inflammatory response.18

 

Disrupting the inflammatory pathways by blocking TSLP can reduce clinical manifestations of severe asthma and severe CRSwNP.2,4,5

 

 

Tezspire-tezepelumab-mechanism-of-action-targeting-top-of-inflammatory-cascade Tezspire-tezepelumab-mechanism-of-action-targeting-top-of-inflammatory-cascade

The mechanism of action of Tezspire in asthma or CRSwNP has not been definitively established

Adapted from Wechsler ME, et al. Respir Res. 2020.

bird-image

Mechanism of Action

Learn more about how TEZSPIRE blocks TSLP

in CRSwNP*.

Explore now

*The mechanism of action for TEZSPIRE in asthma or CRSwNP has not been definitively established.

Back to top

The WAYPOINT clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of TEZSPIRE in adult patients with severe CRSwNP4,5

waypoint-study-design

WAYPOINT was a randomised, Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, placebo-controlled study (N=408) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of Tezspire in adult patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.4,5

 

In the WAYPOINT trial, patients were recruited across 112 sites in ten countries. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive TEZSPIRE 210 mg (n=203) or placebo (n=205) subcutaneously Q4W for 52 weeks.4,5

 

Inclusion criteria:  
 

  • Adults (≥18 years of age) with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP for ≥12 months 
  • Disease severity consistent with the need for surgery despite SOC (INCS)
  • Documented treatment with systemic glucocorticoids in the past 12 months, and/or any prior nasal polyp surgery
  • Total NPS (nasal polyp score) ≥5 (out of 8) at screening (≥2 for each nostril) 
  • NCS (nasal congestion score) of at least 2 (out of 3, with higher scores indicating greater severity) at screening 
  • Ongoing nasal polyp symptoms for >8 weeks prior to screening 
  • SNOT-22 score of at least 30 (out of 110, with higher scores indicating greater severity) at screening 
  • Stable on any SOC treatment for 30 days prior to screening 
     

Exclusion criteria:
 

  • Any coexisting conditions other than asthma that could confound interpretation of the efficacy results
  • Have had sinus surgery in the 6 months before starting the trial or any previous sinus surgery that prevented determination of total NPS results

 

Co-primary endpoints:
 

  • NPS: Change from baseline in endoscopic total NPS at Week 52, with the score for each nostril ranging from 0 (no nasal polyps) to 4 (large nasal polyps causing complete or near-complete blockage)    
  • NCS: Change from baseline in patient-reported mean NCS at Week 52, with the score ranging from 0 (no congestion) to 3 (severe congestion), evaluated using a daily symptom diary and calculated every 2 weeks  
     

Key secondary endpoints: 
 

  • Time to first decision to treat with nasal polyp surgery and/or SCS (individual and composite analyses assessed over a 52-week period)
  • Change from baseline at Week 52 in:
    • SNOT-22 total score
    • Mean loss-of-smell score (calculated every 2 weeks from Nasal Polyp Symptom Diary)
    • Total symptom score (range, 0 to 24; higher scores indicate greater severity)
    • Lund-Mackay score
    • Pre-bronchodilator FEV1, which was assessed in the subgroup of patients with coexisting asthma (n=122 in TEZSPIRE group; n=126 in placebo group)

Additional secondary endpoints:

  • Change in baseline at Week 52 in:
    • Smell-test score on UPSIT
    • ACQ-6 score (n=122 in TEZSPIRE group; n=126 in placebo group)
Safety Outcome:
  • Safety assessments included adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of special interest.

View TEZSPIRE severe asthma study designs

Summary of WAYPOINT co-primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints4,5

TEZSPIRE resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline than placebo in NPS and NCS4,5

Co-primary endpoints

waypoint-primary-endpoint-improvement-in-NPS-with-tezspire-vs-placebo

LSM difference vs placebo: −2.08; 95% CI: −2.40, −1.76;* p<0.0001†1,4,5

Figures adapted from Lipworth BJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(12):1178-88. 


waypoint-primary-endpoint-improvement-in-NCS-with-tezspire-vs-placebo

LSM difference vs placebo: −1.04; 95% CI: −1.21, −0.87;* p<0.0001†1,4,5

TEZSPIRE resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline than placebo in NPS and NCS4

TEZSPIRE was shown to improve SNOT-22 Total Score (QoL) vs placebo4,5

Key Secondary endpoint

waypoint-secondary-endpoint-improvement-in-SNOT-with-tezspire-vs-placebo waypoint-secondary-endpoint-improvement-in-SNOT-with-tezspire-vs-placebo

LSM difference vs placebo: −27.44; 95% CI: −32.51, −22.37;* p<0.0001†1,4

Adapted from Lipworth BJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(12):1178-88.

 

TEZSPIRE was shown to reduce the need for surgery and/or SCS use VS placebo over 52 weeks4 

Key Secondary endpoint (composite endpoint) 

 

92% reduction in the need for surgery and/or use of SCS over 52 weeks vs placebo1,4 

(HR: 0.08; week 52 event rates, 5.7% [Tezspire] vs 31.4% [placebo]; ARR, 25.7%; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.16;* P<0.0001)†1,4 


 

waypoint-secondary-endpoint-reduction-in-need-for-surgery-with-tezspire-vs-placebo waypoint-secondary-endpoint-reduction-in-need-for-surgery-with-tezspire-vs-placebo

Adapted from Lipworth BJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(12):1178-88.     

Key Secondary endpoints (individual endpoints) 

98% reduction in the need for surgery over 52 weeks vs placebo1,4,5

(HR: 0.02; week 52 event rates, 0.5% [Tezspire] vs 22% [placebo]; ARR, 21.5%; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.09;* P<0.0001)†1,4,5



 

89% reduction in the use of SCS over 52 weeks vs placebo1,4,5 

(HR: 0.11; week 52 event rates, 5.2% [Tezspire] vs 19.3% [placebo]; ARR, 14.1%; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.25;* P<0.0001)†1,4,5


TEZSPIRE was shown to improve sense of smell and reduce disease severity1,4,5

Key secondary endpoint 

At Week 52, TEZSPIRE demonstrated a −1.26 point improvement from baseline in NPSD loss-of-smell score vs −0.26 points with placebo. 
LSM difference vs placebo: –1.01 (95% CI: –1.18, –0.83;* p<0.0001† 1

Post-hoc analysis (predefined analysis)

TEZSPIRE demonstrated improvements in NPSD loss-of-smell score from Day 7 of –0.10 points from baseline vs –0.02 points with placebo. 
LSM difference vs placebo: –0.08 (95% CI: –0.15, –0.02;* p=0.009)†33,34

Key secondary endpoints 

waypoint-secondary-endpoint-improvement-in-npsd-total-symptom-score-with-tezspire-vs-placebo waypoint-secondary-endpoint-improvement-in-npsd-total-symptom-score-with-tezspire-vs-placebo

LSM difference vs placebo: −6.96; 95% CI: −8.09, −5.83;* p<0.0001†1,4,5

waypoint-secondary-endpoint-improvement-in-Lund-Mackay-score-with-tezspire-vs-placebo waypoint-secondary-endpoint-improvement-in-Lund-Mackay-score-with-tezspire-vs-placebo

LSM difference vs placebo: −5.70; 95% CI: −6.37, −5.03;* p<0.0001†1,4,5

Lung function: Pre-BD FEV1

Lung function was stable in patients with coexisting asthma treated with TEZSPIRE4,5

Key secondary endpoint – no difference observed

Among patients with coexisting asthma, there was no apparent difference between the TEZSPIRE and placebo groups in the change from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 at Week 52 (TEZSPIRE 0.02 L vs placebo 0.03 L; LSM difference vs placebo: −0.01 L; 95% CI: −0.12, 0.11)‡4,5

In the WAYPOINT trial, additional secondary outcomes were explored4,5

Improvements in UPSIT (smell identification) score were observed in patients with tezepelumab from baseline to week 52 vs placebo

9.31 point increase in UPSIT score from baseline at Week 52 vs -0.19 with placebo.  


LSM difference vs placebo: 9.50 (95% CI: 7.84, 11.16; p<0.001±±)4,5

Among patients with coexisting asthma, a reduction in ACQ-6 score was observed in the Tezspire group vs placebo

-1.20 point improvement in ACQ-6 score from baseline at Week 52 vs -0.82 with placebo.  


LSM difference vs placebo: -0.39 (95% CI: -0.59, -0.19; n.s.)‡4,5§

*Denotes statistically significant after multiplicity adjustment1 


†All p-values are reported as unadjusted1 


‡Assessed in the subgroup of patients with coexisting asthma (n=122 in TEZSPIRE group; n=126 in placebo group)4,5

±±An unadjusted p-value is presented and is not multiplicity corrected

§This endpoint was not included in the multiplicity hierarchy

Back to top

TEZSPIRE can improve outcomes for eligible patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with comorbid severe CRSwNP1,4,5

Niko

Diagnosed with adult-onset asthma at age 39, with a 3-year history of nasal polyps

 

  • Triggers: viral infections, dust mites, pollution, pet dander
and smoke
  • Symptoms: persistent coughing, congestion, mucus production, frequent night-time awakenings, wheezing 
  • Three asthma exacerbations requiring steroid bursts in the
past year 
  • High-dose ICS/LABA plus LAMA and intranasal steroids 
  • Surgery for polyp removal 2 years ago, with recurrence within
1 year 
  • Current Labs 
    • bEOS: 450 cells/µL 
    • FeNO40 ppb
    • FEV1% predicted 68%
    • Total SNOT-22 score: 50 points
  • Total IgE: 130 IU/mL

Back to top

TEZSPIRE and CRSwNP safety profile 

The safety profile of TEZSPIRE in patients with CRSwNP was consistent with previous studies in patients with severe asthma, no new safety concerns were identified in WAYPOINT.

 

The most commonly reported adverse reactions during treatment for asthma are arthralgia (3.8%) and pharyngitis (4.1%) and during treatment for CRSwNP is pharyngitis (5.4%).1 In WAYPOINT, rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar with TEZSPIRE compared to placebo.4,5

Summary of adverse events in WAYPOINT4,5

Tezspire-tezepelumab-summary-of-adverse-events-in-waypoint Tezspire-tezepelumab-summary-of-adverse-events-in-waypoint

TEZSPIRE is contraindicated in patients who have known hypersensitivity to tezepelumab or to any of its excipients listed in the SmPC1  



Additional safety information on special warnings and precautions can be found in the full TEZSPIRE SmPC1

*Patients with CRSwNP or asthma exacerbations. Exacerbations of CRSwNP, defined in the protocol as worsening of symptoms that led to the use of systemic glucocorticoids or systemic antibiotics for at least 3 consecutive days or resulted in hospitalization; no events resulted in hospitalization of patients in either trial group. Asthma exacerbations defined in the protocol as a worsening of asthma that led to any of the following: a temporary burst of systemic glucocorticoids for at least 3 consecutive days, an emergency department or urgent care visit due to asthma that resulted in systemic glucocorticoid therapy for at least 3 consecutive days, or an inpatient hospitalization (for ≥24 hours) due to asthma.

† Serious adverse events were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, led to hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, caused persistent or clinically significant disability or incapacity, or were deemed to be an important medical event
.‡ One patient in the placebo group died from bacterial sepsis.

TEZSPIRE contraindications, warnings and precautions

Tabulated list of adverse reactions

The table below presents the adverse reactions from clinical studies in patients with severe asthma and CRSwNP who received at least one dose of Tezspire in trials of 52 weeks duration, and from post-marketing experience.

 

The frequency of adverse reactions is defined using the following convention: very common (≥ 1/10); common (≥ 1/100 to < 1/10); uncommon (≥ 1/1,000 to < 1/100); rare (≥ 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000); very rare (< 1/10,000); and not known (cannot be estimated from available data). Within each frequency grouping, adverse reactions are presented in order of decreasing seriousness.

System organ classAdverse reactionsFrequency
Infections and infestationsPharyngitisaCommon
Immune system disordersHypersensitivity (including anaphylactic reaction)Not known
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersRashbCommon
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersArthralgiaCommon
General disorders and administration site conditionsInjection site reactioncCommon

a Pharyngitis was defined by the following grouped preferred terms: pharyngitis, pharyngitis bacterial, pharyngitis streptococcal and viral pharyngitis.

b Rash was defined by the following grouped preferred terms: rash, rash pruritic, rash erythematous, rash maculo-papular, rash macular.

c See 'Description of selected adverse reactions'.

Description of selected adverse reactions

Injection site reactions

 

In the pooled safety data from PATHWAY and NAVIGATOR, injection site reactions (e.g. injection site erythema, injection site swelling, injection site pain) occurred at a rate of 3.8% in patients treated with tezepelumab 210 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks (Q4W).

 

Learn more about the safety profile of TEZSPIRE in severe asthma here.

 

Back to top

bird-image

Stay informed

Sign up to AstraZeneca's mailing list if you would like to hear about AstraZeneca events, products and ways to support you & your patients.

Sign Up

By signing up, you would be consenting to receive promotional

and non-promotional emails from AstraZeneca.

Back to top

Abbreviations

ACQ-6=Asthma Control Questionnaire 6; AE=adverse event; ARR=absolute risk reduction; BD, bronchodilator; bEOS=blood eosinophils; CI=confidence interval; COVID-19=Coronavirus disease 2019; CRSwNP=chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; FeNO=fractional exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1=forced expiratory volume in 1 second; HR=hazard ratio; ICS=inhaled corticosteroid; IgE=immunoglobulin E; IL=interleukin; INCS=intranasal corticosteroid; LABA=long-acting β2-agonist; LAMA=long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LSM=least squares mean; NCS=Nasal Congestion Score; NPS=Nasal Polyp Score; NPSD=Nasal Polyposis Symptom Diary; n.s.=not significant; Q4W=4 times per week; QoL=Quality of Life; SAE=serious adverse event; SC=subcutaneous; SCS=systemic corticosteroids; SmPC=Summary of Product Characteristics; SNOT-22=Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22; SOC=standard
of care; T2=type 2; TSLP=thymic stromal lymphopoietin; UPSIT=University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.

References 

  1. Tezspire (tezepelumab). Summary of Product Characteristics.
  2. Menzies-Gow A, Corren J, Bourdin A, et al. Tezepelumab in adults and adolescents with severe, uncontrolled asthma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(19):1800-1809.
  3. Corren J, Parnes JR, Wang L, et al. Tezepelumab in adults with uncontrolled asthma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(10):936-946.
  4. Lipworth BJ, Han JK, Desrosiers M, et al. Tezepelumab in Adults with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(12):1178-1188.
  5. Lipworth BJ, Han JK, Desrosiers M, et al. Supplementary Appendix.Tezepelumab in Adults with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(12):1178-1188.
  6. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;58(Suppl S29):1-464.
  7. Chen S, Zhou A, Emmanuel B, Thomas K, Guiang H. Systematic literature review of the epidemiology and clinical burden of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(11):1897-1911.
  8. Caveney S, Molfino N, Kilpatrick K, et al. Proportion of patients with severe asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: literature review. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024;133(6)(supplS50):R153.
  9. Hellings PW, Fokkens WJ, Orlandi R, et al. The EUFOREA pocket guide for chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2023;61(1):85-89.
  10. De Corso E, Pipolo C, Cantone E, et al. Survey on Use of Local and Systemic Corticosteroids in the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Identification of Unmet Clinical Needs. J Pers Med. 2022;12(6):897.
  11. Fokkens WJ, Lund V, Bachert C, et al. EUFOREA consensus on biologics for CRSwNP with or without asthma. Allergy. 2019;74(12):2312-2319.
  12. Soler ZM, Wittenberg E, Schlosser RJ, Mace JC, Smith TL. Health state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(12):2672-2678.
  13. Claeys N, Teeling MT, Legrand P, et al. Patients Unmet Needs in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Care: A Patient Advisory Board Statement of EUFOREA. Front Allergy. 2021;2:761388.
  14. Ahmed W, et al. Emerging biologic use may reduce the need for corticosteroid treatment and surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (crswnp) in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Thorax. 2025;80:A113–A4.
  15. Philpott C, Hopkins C, Erskine S, et al. The burden of revision sinonasal surgery in the UK—data from the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study (CRES): a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open 2015;5:e00668.
  16. Hopkins C, Conlon S, Chavda S, Hudson R, Rout R. Investigating the secondary care system burden of CRSwNP in sinus surgery patients with clinically relevant comorbidities using the HES database. Rhinology. 2022;60(4):252-260.
  17. Wahid NW, Smith R, Clark A, Salam M, Philpott CM. The socioeconomic cost of chronic rhinosinusitis study. Rhinology. 2020;58(2):112-125.
  18. Gauvreau GM, Sehmi R, Ambrose CS, Griffiths JM. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin: its role and potential as a therapeutic target in asthma. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2020;24(8):777-792.
  19. De Corso E, Hellings PW, Fokkens WJ, et al. Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP): Evidence in Respiratory Epithelial-driven Diseases Including Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024;25(1):7.
  20. Moreno-Jiménez E, Morgado N, Gómez-García M, et al. TSLP and TSLPR Expression Levels in Peripheral Blood as Potential Biomarkers in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(3):1227
  21. Ying S, O'Connor B, Ratoff J, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression is increased in asthmatic airways and correlates with expression of Th2-attracting chemokines and disease severity. J Immunol. 2005;174(12):8183-8190.
  22. Kato A, Schleimer RP, Bleier BS. Mechanisms and pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149(5):1491-1503.
  23. Bachert C, Zhang N, Cavaliere C, Weiping W, Gevaert E, Krysko O. Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(3):725-739.
  24. Mullol J, Azar A, Buchheit KM, Hopkins C, Bernstein JA. Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: Quality of Life in the Biologics Era. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022;10(6):1434-1453.e9.
  25. DeConde AS, Mace JC, Levy JM, Rudmik L, Alt JA, Smith TL. Prevalence of polyp recurrence after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(3):550-555.
  26. van der Veen J, Seys SF, Timmermans M, et al. Real-life study showing uncontrolled rhinosinusitis after sinus surgery in a tertiary referral centre. Allergy. 2017;72(2):282-290.
  27. Peters A, Zhao X, Near AM, et al. Real-world Outcomes Following Biologic Initiation in US Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Adv Ther. 2025;42(4):1783–99.
  28. Chipps BE, Soong W, Panettieri RA Jr, et al. Number of patient-reported asthma triggers predicts uncontrolled disease among specialist-treated patients with severe asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023;130(6):784-790.e5.
  29. Menzies-Gow A, Wechsler ME, Brightling CE. Unmet need in severe, uncontrolled asthma: can anti-TSLP therapy with tezepelumab provide a valuable new treatment option?. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):268.
  30. Kaur D, Doe C, Woodman L, et al. Mast cell-airway smooth muscle crosstalk: the role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin. Chest. 2012;142(1):76-85.
  31. Laidlaw TM, Menzies-Gow A, Caveney S, et al. Tezepelumab Efficacy in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma with Comorbid Nasal Polyps in NAVIGATOR. J Asthma Allergy. 2023;16:915-932
  32. Panettieri R Jr, Lugogo N, Corren J, Ambrose CS. Tezepelumab for Severe Asthma: One Drug Targeting Multiple Disease Pathways and Patient Types. J Asthma Allergy. 2024;17:219-236.
  33. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. Data on File. REF-297520.
  34. Pfaar O, et al. Onset of action of tezepelumab in adults with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the phase 3 WAYPOINT study. European Rhinologic Society (ERS) 2025 June 22–25, 2025; Budapest, Hungary.

 

GB-72789 | June 2026 

 

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App Store. Adverse events should also be reported to AstraZeneca by visiting https://contactazmedical.astrazeneca.com/ or by calling ‌‌‌0‌‌‌8‌‌‌‌‌0‌‌‌‌0‌‌‌ ‌‌7‌‌‌‌‌‌8‌‌‌3‌‌‌ ‌‌0‌‌‌‌‌0‌‌‌‌3‌‌‌‌3‌‌‌.

Connessiallasalute.it

This website was created for UK HCPs and has been designed to provide information to educate, empower and enable them in the great work they are doing for patients across a range of therapy areas. This website is intended for doctors, nurses, and pharmacists in the UK. Other UK residents please visit astrazeneca.co.uk.

Terms of use

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy

Contact Us

LinkedIn

Twitter

©2024 AstraZeneca. GB-78067 | DOP: July 2026